Cleo, Montana

Not sure. It is still the same realm. Just after relocation one name went missing. I did a remark in first post.

I agree with @Sparkles, whenever names are removed it should definitely be archived. How else would you be able to easily find things regarding Cleo later, when people go searching for it afterwards? If you are going to practice discretion, and follow realm numbers when it suits, you will only turn this forum into the same bloody mess as the archive.

In my opinion relocations should go back in the same position on the apartment list as they were in before they went offline.

Yes for sure. I second this. What do you think about this @kaya ? This way the places which do constant relocations canā€™t cheat their way up the list anymore.

I agree, but this was not only a relocation, a tenant left the project as well.

One name getting removed never lead to changing the position on the list.

Okay I will archive this one and make a new one. Alright :wink:

Iā€™m talking about the forum, not the apartment list.

Here is Montanas new topic:

Usually thatā€™s what happens, but when there are two places instead of one I donā€™t think that would be fair enough. Same question about old place and changing participants - does it deserve bump or not? Guess it depends. Anyway, itā€™s not support who defines list order:)

1 Like

But I have the impression the +7 places use the many relocations for getting up the list again. I canā€™t imagine a different reason for relocating so often. :thinking: :upside_down_face:

1 Like

very hot show girls :ok_hand:t5:

beautiful for sureā€¦

Havenā€™t many of them had landlord and/or neighbor problems?