Agnia and Stephanie are totally wasted apartments. Nothing ever goes on, and it is boring and wasted! Need more parties and sex action. Most of the time it is excellent We need more machines like Elon.
Totaly agreed. I saw only one small mast at the night, from bad angle in the living room of Steph, under 4 months! I think activity is up from the people in the apartments, but this is a joke, and totaly waste of money. If the most active people are leave the projects, the site will be in trouble - this girls maybe are pretty, but very boring as well.
2 Likes
I agree with you. They have been in trouble for more than a year and are not going to carry out the project because the managers are more useless than the contestants.
1 Like
They are actually my two favorites. I can’t see in agnia s bathroom but I have seen people on the toilet in Stephanie s place. But now the camera is offline and I don’t understand all of the reasons that happens
Um, here’s an idea, don’t watch them then. People sure do want to get rid of places they don’t like. You do realize that there isn’t exactly a long line of people waiting to get a spot on vhtv. You get what the managers present and that’s all you get. Getting rid of tenants in no way makes it more likely better tenants will replace them.
3 Likes
Basicaly, you are right. Btw, I will be very happy, if I can turn off the apartment on my list, but I cant. In the first weeks, I just checked them sometimes, for any news, but nothing - just a few naked girls with their phones 0-24. Every, single, day. No interactions, no parties, no anything. Not just sex, nothing. I dont know too much about this voyeur-thing, and Im 100% sure, I know so much less then you (I always respect your comments), but I think, this is really a waste of money of the site/project/company, doesnt matter is the main goal of the project is showing sexuality, or just regular life for joy. And, as somebody said, if some of them are porn-stars, and no need many for them, then why are they on this site?
Personaly, I not have problem with them. Actualy, I do not care about that apartments, but totally agreed with the others in this topic - thats why I dont watch them.
1 Like
Yes, i agree, Steph and her friends are definitely the prettiest girls on the site but don’t really do anything apart from lounge around in their undies all day. I’d love to see a bit of girl girl action in their apartment. Maybe they could learn a thing or two from watching Montana’s cams!
1 Like
that realm is for stupid parties, they will never do anything interesting.
They probably do enough money to survive, that’s pretty stupid policy; @VHTV_CEO should set up a bit higher threshold to prevent loafers inflowing to the project;
I agree with you but vhtv won’t do anything
Probably not; the only solution is not to watch it, lol
1 Like
Funny i seem to be almost alone in liking this flat I just like looking at pretty girls maybe . They don;t have to be deep in the throes of passion or even masturbating. I would move in with them tomorrow !!
1 Like
These changes are on the way.
1 Like
So you are going to make the tenants compete for a spot on your site or face your jack boot? Sounds like you aim to create a hostile working environment.
1 Like
Life is tough; competition is a part of our every day life, at every level, all the time, whether you are at work, at school, even among family members; simply wake up 
But not in your home where you’re supposed to living your real life. Pretty sure you’re not a risk for getting kicked to the curb because friends stop visiting you. If they do this, it’s a clear acknowledgement that this is indeed not about real life people, it’s a job and their sex is work.
2 Likes
Um… I think, this conversation is sliding to a theoretical conversation about principles. I just would like to remind everyone: basicaly, this site (and all other voyeur-cam site) is based on a deal. The tenants accept to living in a house with cameras, and accept to do nasty things for make more viewers, who viewers paying for this to the company, and the tenants get money from the company for this. And, I know, this is Russia, but I dont think, they put an AK to the tenants head for doing this, or k____pping the girls into the apartments form the streets of Novosibirsk… So, they do this, because they said, they want to do this. And please, dont say, they had no chioce, I working in a f*ckin factory… 
And this is just a friendly reminder. To everyone.
Oh, and I never seen any sign, the VHTV saying, this is “real life”, or this is not a sex-work…
4 Likes
This is an off topic, topic that’s not in the apt topics. Seems like a discussion about what makes apartments a waste is relevant. Anyways, here you go. Remember, real time, real life. What you’re talking about is a production for the audience, not what they claim to be a about.
Who are the people we see on the website and according to what scenario do they act?
People you see online are not actors/porn actors, instead they are real people living their daily routine - work, fitness, parties, sex. There are no scenarios, no operators, no video edition or censorship - real life, real time. Each of these guys has his story and reasons, why he started participating in this project. Information about each person you can find on the web site.
Do these people know about the cameras?
Of course, otherwise it would be illegal. Our participants have signed special contracts and can leave anytime they want, so be sure that they feel comfortable in such conditions.
I’ve looked through all the cameras, but saw no one in the apartment. Where are the people?
Remember - real time, real life? Participants can be working, walking outside or simply shopping or clubbing. Please, do not panic and wait a little bit. We are always posting information, if our birdies will be out for a long time. NOTE: please pay attention to your time zone, because it might be different from the one the people you are watching are living in
2 Likes
The company’s position on this topic is as follows.
- The company does not hire models. Doesn’t dictate to anyone what content should be. We work in the interests of the audience - what kind of content the audience likes, this gets more financial return for content makers. All successful projects work on the same principle, be it YouTube, or Twitch, or something else.
- More active models are in the interest of the audience. With this, it seems, no one argues. What we do by regulating the money distribution system is we stimulate managers to find more active people. Not f_____g the lazy to do something, but finding those who do not need to be f___ed.
- We, in principle, do not care what kind of content will be on our cameras. Models can recite out loud Pushkin and Lermontov, or have sex in a hammock and on skis. The main thing is that the audience likes it. It so happened that Pushkin’s recitation does not bring the audience the pleasure that sex in a hammock is on skis.
3 Likes
With these points, it is normal that the project is more sunk than the titanic.